CeramicSpeed Sport v EUIPO - Golec (OSPW System)

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber)11 June 2025 (*)( EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark OSPW System – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 )In Case T‑352/24,Ceramic Speed Sport A/S, established in Holstebro (Denmark), represented by K. Kvistgaard‑Aaholm, lawyer,applicant,v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent,defendant,the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being Marcin Golec, residing in London (United Kingdom), represented by K. Muraro, G. Russo and C. Comolli Acquaviva, lawyers,THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber),composed of M. J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and P. Zilgalvis, Judges,Registrar: V. Di Bucci,having regard to the written part of the procedure,having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,gives the following Judgment 1        By its action under Article 263...